Money can't buy late Prof Torben Monberg work on Bellona

Former Secretary of State and President Barrack Hussein Obama

Statement: New evidence that the State Department and the White House conspired to coverup the Benghazi attack which resulted in the death of American diplomats and a US Ambassador (in an attempt to wash-over the newly Democrat's approach to foreign policy - now turned out to be a huge bust) is stunning! The administration has been trying to bury the scandal and did so successfully prior to the presidential election, but with the light of the new evidence pointing to the State Department's head - Hillary Clinton, and President Obama - the duo are obviously in panic mode. First, President Obama knew what was going on and spoke to the Libyan government and the US diplomats in Tripoli and promised to get to the bottom of the whole incident, yet he went off to a fundraiser in Vegas. Contrary to everything he said since the incident, people on the ground testified that communications to Washington, D.C from Tripoli never mentioned a protest.
Obama lied! Secondly, Hillary Clinton, after running around the media and spent more time abroad in an attempt bury the incident which happened under her watch, only emerge to tell another FAT lie - she said she didn't know junk. The evidence now emerged from this hearing depicting her as a LIAR. She according to these whistle blowers had a dirty hand in refusing to increase security prior to the Benghazi attack and subsequently reducing the 30 DS (Diplomat Securities) to just 6, and the deliberate coverup in the aftermath is stunning. In the ensuing hours of hearing at the hill, evidence showed that the Obama administration received the talking points from CIA and went through it - all references to terrorism was removed and the cause(s) of the attack on US embassy was reduced to a "demonstrations" against the anti-Islam youtube video. The talking points were edited 12 times (according to ABC source) by the Obama administration which then okayed the US ambassador to the UN to take the talking points to five major news news channels. Hillary and Obama also made the same argument. In debunking this, Mr. Hicks who oversaw things in Tripoli argued that the memo he sent to Washington, D.C was altered and that he had never mentioned "protest" and that his jaw dropped after watching the testimony of ambassador Rice which blamed the attack on US embassy on a protest that went absolutely wrong. This is an eye opener and someone ought to take responsibility for it. This is a country that chastises presidential candidates over little things like 'hiring of illegal immigrants', a 'nasty divorce' etc etc, smoking weeks and sniffing cocaine as far back as 40 to 50 years. Why on earth is this huge scandal not blowing up in the face of the US government and the State Department? Why's every major cable network devoted only a few minutes to the Beghanzi saga? Where's the outrage? This is absolutely stunning!