The Radicalization of American Public Policies

The worst fear in America right now is that the man who might become the President in the coming week, exhibits the real true characteristics of Socialism and Marxism. In the above interview with Joe the Plumber who questioned Sen. Obama over his tax plans that will more likely to tax him and his business higher than any US administration, Sen. Obama replied:

"My attitude is that... I think if we spread the wealth around its good for you..." (obama).

His association with Mr. Frank in Hawaii (discussed in Article: The Man with many Faces), the radical Poet and a member of the Communist Party USA; with domestic terrorists, Mr. Ayers, who have bombed police stations and important landmarks in Washington DC and New York; his membership in Rev. Wright's church, a church that preaches and advocates the destruction of the United States, have shaped Sen. Obama's political views. The Harvard and Columbia Universities have so far refusing to release Sen. Obama's college records (transcript and college research papers), however, one of his research papers was on "Russian Disarmament" which explains just why Sen. Obama is obsessed with equal distribution of wealth and punishment for the rich hardworking individuals.
In one of the interviews in Florida, journalist Barbara West of WFTV asked Sen. Obama's running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, this question:



The quote that the journalist dropped on Sen. Joe Biden is not a conservative talking point, nor does McCain comes up with this quote out of desperation as the Liberals have portrayed. But this quote exists for hundreds of years.

...From each according to his ability, to each according to his need! marxist-org

Sen. Obama's political ideology and economic plans precipitated from his personal experience as a community organizer and an association with radical, controversial figures who think that White America is way to rich, and colored people have been marginalized. His idea of "spreading the wealth" around means that the hardworking middle-class and big businesses that have driven this country to where it is today, is not only Marxism in all aspects, but a policy born of hatred and anger. He will have to sacrifice the earnings of poor hard-working people for the satisfaction of those who have helped him in his life as a Community-Organizer.
In fact, it is not a new perspective-that is spreading the wealth around.



Back in 2001, Sen. Obama spoke in an interview with WBEZ.FM (Chicago) back in 2001 where he suggested that the Supreme Court should consider redistribution of wealth. He said that the SC never "ventured into the issue of redistribution of wealth" and the people should pay more attention to "political and economic justice" in the society. The senator was mourning the fact that the SC didn't look into the issue of "re-distributive change" or in economic terms, "redistribution of wealth". In other words, these are areas untested and he is willing to do it when he becomes had the opportunity. It is also evident that the ideas of "re-distributive change or equal distribution of wealth" may have been an economic ideology he gained from College years.
But the most frightening implication of the statement is that anyone who works hard and pays his taxes is in fact doing a great deal of injustice to the American people. Under his plans, he will tax the life out of businesses and rich people in order to reward the unemployed, the community thugs who don't want to work but live on welfare. This will be the greatest day-light robbery of Americans' asserts by a president who thinks that a hard-worker is a criminal. The Sen. Obama's economic plan demonstrated how detached he is from the main stream America; capitalism is about competition and hard-working and some make have achieved the American dream by hard work. Sen. Obama openly declared that he will tax anyone earning 200K and above.
Big corporations earned a lot of money, but at the same time paying higher taxes as well as providing job opportunities for able people. There are oil companies and other big corporations that earned huge profits, but their profit margin maybe 10% or even less.
It is therefore ridiculous for Sen. Obama to claim tax break for middle class. Tho who work really hard with an earning of $200-250,000 will have to pay higher taxes in the Obama-Biden administration. Sen. Obama's explanation? the middle class needs tax-break. Tax break from what? you don't give someone tax relief unless he pays more taxes than anyone in the neighborhood. This is fake and Marxism (Socialism) at best and it will help drive the nation down the road to "economic hell".
The truth that Sen. Obama didn't discuss in his economic plans is that the Middle Class, about 45% don't pay Taxes. The bottom-line is that he will be giving tax-break to people who never paid a single dime! That's stealing from hard-working people!
When asked about Sen. Obama's Tax plan, Sen. Biden, again, spewing out crap:



US was a country founded by colonists who repudiated Great Britain's Tax Laws, which were passed in by British lawmakers without representation of the colonists. The Colonies require to pay more taxes under Tax laws they didn't support or endorse. But here is Sen. Biden calling Sen. Obama's tax policy, regardless of how stupid it is, patriotic!
IT IS TIME TO BE PATRIOTIC by paying higher taxes? This is pathetic.

Foreign Policy (Diplomacy and Military)
Sen. Obama has zero experience in foreign policy as he is running with a thin resume; he is being in the Senate for a little over one hundred days. His running mate, Joe Biden (a man being accused of plagiarism in college) has a lot of experience, but nothing significant attached to his name that makes him a more qualified foreign policy expert in this election. But he is known for one thing, saying a load lies (craps) without a smile and rendering them as truths!
He is known for saying things that sound contrary to the Sen. Obama's campaign, and at times The Sen. Obama's camp were forced to make statements to answer public scrutiny. For instance, he claimed that he didn't like clean coal, a statement that Obama said he (Biden) should have waited for him before answering your. And a couple days ago, Biden said that following:




The man who wants to be a president is going to be tested? Just like Kennedy who failed the Bay of Pig-invasion of Cuba? Like Kennedy who let Fidel Castro survived to this very day, torturing and killing those who opposed him? Isn't this a sign that the man who is going to be the president is weak and that Sen. Biden is pleading on his behalf? Stick with us, help us even if our response is suck? just like President Clinton who tacked tail and ran after more than a dozen American soldiers were slaughtered in Mogadishu, Somalia.
Now, this is where experience and credibility comes to play. Both presidential candidates were briefed on foreign policy updates, Sen. John McCain, with all his experience in war etc. kept everything to himself and here is Sen. Biden spewing out warnings as if he is Mr. KNOW IT all. A few hours later, Sen. Obama appeared in a rally in Richmond, Virginia, to put Biden's comment straight. He said that what Biden meant was that anyone who becomes a president will have to be test, but that is not what Mr. Biden's said when he referred specifically to Sen. Obama.
This is the same man (Sen. Biden) who, when ran against Sen. Obama and other candidates in the Democratic primary, said that the US president office is not for job training, implying that Sen. Obama is in experience and run with an empty resume for the tough job. How about the Clintons? they are backing Sen. Obama right now, but during the primary, Sen. Clinton said that Sen. Obama is not experienced that the country would be more safer under Sen. John McCain. Their support for Sen. Obama is nothing more than an allegiance to their party, but their words will remain a testament against their nominee; an inexperience Sen. Obama that will be driving the nation down the road to hell.
On the light of Sen. Biden's statement, it is obvious that Sen. Obama's response to any global catastrophe will be a complete failure. Sen. Biden statement was more like a plea to the people in America that even if their response will be wrong, he was hopping that the people will support them all the way through. It is not surprise though that one of Sen. Obama's weakest argument lies in the diplomacy and conflict and resolution. Unlike his opponent, Sen. John McCain who graduated from the Naval Academy and became an officer in the Navy, commanding his Navy men in successful mission, never gave up even when imprisoned in Vietnam with two broken arms and legs, and who later become an advocate of anti-torture, Sen. Obama doesn't have any military experience at all.
Sen. Obama lived through the Vietnam war but never served in the military even though drafting of young, able men was passed by Congress. His failure to serve his country in Vietnam is something he needs to answer for.
In one of the Democratic debates, Sen. Obama vowed to negotiate with all American enemies "without pre-condition," a diplomacy that US enemies love. They love to talk while their activities continue behind their backs.